Unfamiliar
oriole-like call which was clearly different from both Black-naped
Oriole Oriolus chinensis and White-lored Oriole Oriolus
xanthonotus albiloris. The call was recorded and the bird
responded immediately to playback by flying in overhead
to within 10 m. The combination of a heavy, broad-based
grey bill, bluegrey legs, yellowish
underparts washed olive on the breast-sides, plain olive
head and upperparts, green wings with brighter yellow fringes,
and yellow rather than white lores quickly identified the
bird as an Isabela Oriole. A second singing bird which appeared
identical in appearance was soon located and the next two
hours were spent studying the birds, which were still present
and calling strongly when the observer left.
The birds were in an area of degraded secondary forest with
extensive areas of bamboo, and they spent most of their
time in the canopy of two large mayapis trees Anisoptera
thurifera. They were generally unobtrusive and both spent
much of their time calling from different perches in the
canopy. The birds were not observed actively feeding during
the period of observation despite several Blackish Cuckooshrike
Coracina coerulescens, Bar-bellied Cuckooshrike C. striata
and
|
Balicassiao
Dicrurus balicassius feeding in the same area.
Some good sound recordings of the calls were made, generally
falling into two categories (Fig. 1, sonagrams 1 and 2).
The birds responded strongly to
occasional playback by flying in directly overhead, often
at close range, and usually gave a rather agitated call
(Fig. 1, sonagram 3). This latter call was otherwise only
occasionally interspersed with the normal call.
The birds were again present on 29 March and were watched
for some two hours during the late afternoon.
The birds still favoured the same area, but were less mobile,
spending much of the time perched on open branches within
the canopy of one of the large trees, usually within 5 m
and often within 2 m of each other. Again, both birds called
regularly throughout the period of observation.
No other Isabela Orioles were located in the area despite
regularly playing the recorded calls around nearby Apaya,
an old logging camp in selectively logged but disturbed
forest, and along the route between the two sites.
|
| In
the afternoon of 25 May, the calls recorded by RH were played
by MvW at the site where the species had been observed in
March. The large trees in which the birds had been previously
seen had very recently been felled, but two orioles responded
and flew to surrounding trees, about 50 m apart and 25 m from
the observer. The birds were not observed, however, but repeatedly
responded to each other and to the tape
recorder with exactly the same call as being played back.
On 26 May at 10h30, one oriole responded to playback and moved
from degraded forest with bamboo stands to a large tree, locally
known as Dita Alstonia scholaris, in the company of three
Blackish Cuckooshrikes. This bird was seen well for several
seconds before disappearing into dense foliage: it was entirely
green/yellow with heavily streaked wings, the bill was large
and blackish (not reddish as in Whitelored Oriole which is
endemic to northern Luzon) and the white lores were absent
(again separating it from White-lored Oriole). It was later
seen moving between large trees (Dracontomelon dao, Endospermum
peltatum, Anisoptera thurifera and Alstonia scholaris), always
in the canopy, in the company of Blackish Cuckooshrike, Bar-bellied
Cuckooshrike, Black-and-white Triller Lalage melanoleuca and
Balicassiao. It no longer responded directly to playback and
did not approach. However, it did call from time to time and
received a response from a second bird on the other side of
the river, some 100 m away. Playback was used over 26–29
May in a variety of habitats near Ambabok, but no additional
responses were received.
Three different sounds were recorded: (1) a clear, mournful,
slightly descending whistle lasting 0.5 s, repeated irregularly
every 1-2 s, resembling Fig. 1, sonagram 1; (2) a slightly
higher, rising whistle, usually with a slight terminal inflection,
lasting about 0.75 s, also irregularly repeated every 1-2
s, resembling Fig. 1, sonagram 2; (3) a harsh, rolling call,
not unlike a cricket, lasting about 0.25 s, usually given
at a rate of 2 calls/s and repeated every 2 s (resembling
Fig. 1, sonagram 3), usually given as a long series in response
to playback but occasionally interspersed with the other calls.
In May 2003, an additional call was heard but not recorded:
a clear three-tone whistle lasting 1 s with the second tone
higher than the first, and the third lower than the first
and second. These calls differ considerably from the varied
vocabulary of White-lored Oriole in which the commonest two
or three note calls are longer and flutier. The typical call
of the closely related Philippine Oriole Oriolus xanthonotus,
which is absent from Luzon, is a slightly longer, higher-pitched
and flutier whistle than Isabela Oriole, and rises noticeably
towards the end.
Ambabok was revisited during 1–4 April 2004 by MvW.
A pair of Isabela Orioles, probably the same as those seen
in 2003, was observed in exactly the same area. One individual
responded strongly to whistled imitations of the calls described
above. On 3 April it was captured in a mist-net. The bird
was measured, documented (Plates 1–3) and released.The
description in Kennedy et al. (2000) is accurate with the
exception of the colouring of upperparts and underparts; we
suggest describing the upperparts as dark olive-yellow (yellow-olive
in Kennedy et al.) and the underparts as bright yellow with
an olive wash (olive-yellow in in Kennedy et al. (2000) is
accurate with the exception of the colouring of upperparts
and underparts; we suggest describing the upperparts as dark
olive-yellow (yellow-olive in Kennedy et al.) and the underparts
as bright yellow with an olive wash (olive-yellow in Kennedy
et al.). The contrast |
between
upperparts and underparts is rather strong.The main field
characters distinguishing the species from the similar White-lored
Oriole are the stout greyish bill and the lack of whitish
lores. The pair was observed regularly, sometimes also with
Black-naped Oriole in addition to the flockspecies
observed in 2003. On four occasions Isabela Orioles were observed
eating caterpillars.
CONSERVATION
Ambabok (17o01’26”N 122o10’44”E) is
the location of a former small settlement on the edge of the
Sierra Madre mountain range on the banks of the Catalangan
River.The village was deserted in 1994 and open grassy fields
and small patches of degraded forest and bamboo remain. The
elevation is around 200 m. The large open area with forest
patches is bordered by selectively logged forest which gradually
becomes less disturbed eastwards towards the mountains. Administratively
Ambabok is part of barangay Dibuluan in the municipality of
San Mariano, Isabela province. Ambabok is situated just inside
the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park (NSMNP), the largest
of ten priority protected areas in the Philippines under the
National Integrated Protected Area System (NIPAS). Although
protected on paper, law enforcement in the Ambabok area (on
the western side of the NSMNP) is generally lacking and the
lowland forest on this side of the park is under heavy pressure
from illegal small-scale logging. During the May 2003 and
April 2004 visits, a large number of loggers were active in
Ambabok, which is used as a campsite, and in the surrounding
forest. Selective logging for the larger and most valuable
timber trees has now disturbed all remaining lowland forest
on this side of the Sierra Madre. Several internationally
funded conservation projects are active in the area. A new
project funded by the Netherlands and implemented by WWF Philippines
intends to address the illegal logging in the park through
a combination of community development, awareness-raising
and strengthening of law enforcement.
The Isabela Oriole thus still occurs in Isabela province in
the municipality (San Mariano) where the holotype was collected
in 1894 (Dickinson et al. 1991) and near Disulap (8 km south-west
of Ambabok) where 11 specimens were collected in 1961 when
the species apparently was still quite common (Collar et al.
1999). The recording and description of the call will perhaps
lead to more observations of this species. However, the facts
that (1) many observers have been looking for the species
during recent years without success, including a DENR/BirdLife
survey team in 1991 and 1992 (Danielsen et al. 1994, Poulsen
1995) plus many keen birdwatchers brought to the area by Tim
Fisher’s bird expeditions in the Philippines, and (2)
the first author did not observe any other Isabela Orioles
during three years of extensive fieldwork in the area, indicate
that the species is probably genuinely rare rather than merely
cryptic.
The reasons for the apparent rarity and patchy distribution
of the species are unclear, but the known elevation range
is 50–440 m (Collar et al. 1999), indicating that it
could be a lowland forest specialist. |